Final Notice

On , the Financial Conduct Authority issued a Final Notice to Athanass Stefanopoulos

FINAL NOTICE

ACTION

1.
For the reasons set out in this Final Notice, the Financial Services Authority (the
“FSA”) hereby takes the following action against Athanass Stefanopoulos (“Mr
Stefanopoulos”).

2.
The FSA gave Mr Stefanopoulos a Decision Notice on 31 August 2011 (the “Decision
Notice”), which notified Mr Stefanopoulos that, for the reasons given below and
pursuant to section 45 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the “Act”), the
FSA had decided to cancel the permission granted to Mr Stefanopoulos under Part IV
of the Act (“Mr Stefanopoulos’s Part IV permission”).

3.
On 27 September 2011, Mr Stefanopoulos referred that decision to the Upper Tribunal
(Tax and Chancery Chamber) (the “Tribunal”). The Tribunal, in a written decision
published on 28 May 2012, directed that Mr Stefanopoulos’s Part IV permission
should be cancelled.





/cont...


REASONS FOR ACTION

5.
On the basis of the facts and matters described in the Warning Notice issued to Mr
Stefanopoulos dated 28 April 2011 and the Decision Notice, it appears to the FSA that
Mr Stefanopoulos is failing to satisfy the threshold conditions set out in Schedule 6 to
the Act (the "Threshold Conditions").

6.
An extract of the Decision Notice, which sets out the specific reasons for the action, is
attached as an Annex to this Notice. The Decision Notice itself is published on the
FSA’s web site.

7.
Following a hearing on 11 April 2012, the Tribunal concluded that it did not consider
Mr Stefanopoulos met the standards of fitness and propriety required by Threshold
Condition 5. The Tribunal was also not satisfied that Mr Stefanopoulos had adequate
human or financial resources in relation to the regulated activities that he carried on,
as required by Threshold Condition 4. The Tribunal dismissed Mr Stefanopoulos’s
reference and directed the FSA to cancel Mr Stefanopoulos’s Part IV permission by
issuing a Final Notice. A copy of the Tribunal’s written decision can be found on the
Tribunal’s website.

DECISION MAKER

8.
The decision which gave rise to the obligation to give this Final Notice was made by
the Regulatory Decisions Committee.

9.
This Final Notice is given to Mr Stefanopoulos in accordance with section 390(2)(a)
of the Act.

PUBLICITY

10.
Sections 391(4), 391(6) and 391(7) of the Act apply to the publication of information
about the matter to which this Final Notice relates. Under those provisions, the FSA
must publish such information about the matter to which this Final Notice relates as
the FSA considers appropriate. The information may be published in such manner as
the FSA considers appropriate. However, the FSA may not publish information if
such publication would, in the opinion of the FSA, be unfair to Mr Stefanopoulos or
prejudicial to the interests of consumers.

11.
The FSA intends to publish this Final Notice and such information about the matter to
which this Final Notice relates as it considers appropriate.









/cont...
FSA CONTACT

12.
For more information concerning this matter generally, please contact Stephanie
Prowse at the FSA (direct line: 020 7066 9404 / fax: 020 7066 9405).





John Kirby
FSA Enforcement and Financial Crime Division





































/cont...


ANNEX

EXTRACT FROM THE DECISION NOTICE ISSUED BY THE FINANCIAL
SERVICES AUTHORITY TO ATHANASS STEFANOPOULOS ON 31 AUGUST 2011

“2.2.
Specifically, the FSA is not satisfied that Mr Stefanopoulos is able to meet, or that
there is a realistic possibility that he will be able to meet, the obligations of his
business having regard to all the circumstances, including:

(1)
his repeated failure to pay promptly fees and levies owed to the FSA since
August 2005;

(2)
his failure to comply with the terms of a Settlement Agreement that he entered
into with the FSA on 17 February 2009 (“the Agreement”), whereby Mr
Stefanopoulos undertook to pay his next two sets of periodic fees and levies
by the due date, failing which he would apply for the cancellation of his Part
IV permission;

(3)
his failure to co-operate with the FSA’s requests that he apply for the
cancellation of his Part IV permission; and

(4)
his continuing health problems since being admitted to hospital in July 2005.”



END OF EXTRACT


© regulatorwarnings.com

Regulator Warnings Logo