Final Notice
On , the Financial Conduct Authority issued a Final Notice to Buttercup Finance Ltd
FINAL NOTICE
ACTION
1. By an application dated 24 September 2020, Buttercup Finance Ltd (“Buttercup”)
applied under section 55A of the Act for Part 4A permission to carry on the regulated
activities of:
a)
Agreeing to carry on a regulated activity
b)
Limited permission credit broking.
2. The Application is incomplete.
3. For the reasons listed below, the Authority has refused the Application.
SUMMARY OF REASONS
4. Buttercup has failed to respond to requests for the provision of information considered
by the Authority to be necessary to allow the Application to be determined. The last
request included a statement to the effect that Buttercup must contact the Authority
within 10 business days, or the Authority would issue Buttercup with a Warning Notice.
No response was received.
5. By its Warning Notice dated 07 October 2021 the Authority gave notice that it proposed
to refuse the Application and that Buttercup was entitled to make representations to
the Authority about that proposed action.
6. As no representations have been received by the Authority from Buttercup within the
time allowed by the Warning Notice, the default procedures in paragraph 2.3.2 of the
Authority’s Decision Procedure and Penalties Manual apply, permitting the Authority to
treat the matters referred to in its Warning Notice as undisputed and, accordingly, to
give a Decision Notice.
7. By its Decision Notice dated 19 November 2021 (“The Decision Notice”), the Authority
gave Buttercup notice that it had decided to take the action described above.
8. Buttercup had 28 days from the date the Decision Notice was given to refer the matter
to the Upper Tribunal (formerly known as the Financial Services and Markets Tribunal).
No referral was made to the Upper Tribunal within this period of time or to date.
9. Under section 390 (1) of the Act, the Authority having decided to refuse the Application
and there having been no reference of that decision to the Tribunal, must give
Buttercup Final Notice of its refusal.
10. The Authority decided to refuse the Application and to give this Final notice as
Buttercup has failed to provide the information required by the Authority and, in the
absence of the information sought, the Authority cannot ensure that Buttercup will
satisfy, and continue to satisfy, the threshold conditions set out in Schedule 6 of the
Act, specifically:
a) That the firm can be effectively supervised by the Authority as required by
threshold condition 2C;
b) That the firm has appropriate human resources, given Buttercup’s failure to provide
the Authority with the requested information as required by threshold condition
2D; and
c) That the firm will conduct its business with integrity and in compliance with proper
standards as required by threshold condition 2E.
DEFINITIONS
11. The definitions below are used in this Final Notice.
“the Act” means the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
“the Application” means the application referred to in paragraph [1]/[2] above.
“the Authority” means the body corporate previously known as the Financial
Services Authority and renamed on 1 April 2013 as the Financial Conduct Authority.
“the Warning Notice” means the warning notice dated 07 October 2021 given to
the applicant by the Authority.
“Buttercup” means Buttercup Finance Ltd
FACTS AND MATTERS
12. The Application was received by the Authority on 24 September 2020.
13. Further information was requested from Buttercup under section 55U(5) of the Act.
14. On 5 July 2021, the Authority asked Buttercup to consider withdrawing its application
for limited permission consumer credit permissions. This request was made because
Buttercup appeared to be a primary credit broker, and therefore required full
permission consumer credit permissions. The Authority cannot do this for the applicant.
15. Buttercup failed to provide a response by the deadline of 12 July 2021.
16. Between 21 July 2021 and 3 August 2021, the Authority attempted to contact
Buttercup by telephone on 4 separate occasions. No contact was made in respect of
any of these attempts.
17. On 11 August 2021 and 13 September 2021, the Authority sent a letter to Buttercup
by email and by recorded delivery, noting the lack of a response to its requests for the
information and informing it that a failure to provide the information would result in
the Application being determined based upon the information received to date, and
that this might result in the Authority issuing Buttercup with a Warning Notice
proposing to refuse the Application. Buttercup failed to respond by the stated deadlines
of 27 August 2021 and 27 September 2021 respectively.
18. On 07 October 2021 a Warning Notice was issued by the Authority advising Buttercup
that it proposed to refuse the Application and that Buttercup was entitled to make
representations to the Authority about that proposed action.
19. As no representations have been received by the Authority from Buttercup within the
time allowed by the Warning Notice, the default procedures in paragraph 2.3.2 of the
Authority’s Decision Procedure and Penalties Manual apply, permitting the Authority to
treat the matters referred to in its Warning Notice as undisputed and, accordingly, to
give a Decision Notice.
IMPACT ON THE THRESHOLD CONDITIONS
20. Buttercup has failed to respond to 8 separate requests for the provision of information
considered by the Authority to be necessary to allow the Application to be determined.
The final request gave Buttercup 10 business days to respond and included a statement
to the effect that Buttercup must contact the Authority, or the Authority would issue
Buttercup with a Warning Notice. As no response was received to that final request a
warning notice was issued.
21. The Authority must therefore determine the Application based upon the information
received to date, in circumstances where its requests for information have not been
met. Having reviewed that information, the Authority cannot ensure that Buttercup
satisfies, and will continue to satisfy, the threshold conditions.
22. Authorised firms (and those seeking authorisation) are expected to engage with the
Authority in an open and cooperative way. The failure to provide the requested
information raises concerns that Buttercup would fail to do so if the Application were
to be granted.
23. The failure to provide the information raises concerns as to whether Buttercup:
a. can be effectively supervised by the Authority as required by threshold
condition 2C;
b. has appropriate human resources, given Buttercup’s failure to provide the
Authority with the requested information as required by threshold condition
2D; and
c. will conduct its business with integrity and in compliance with proper
standards as required by threshold condition 2E.
PROCEDURAL MATTERS
24. This Final Notice is given under section 390 (1) of the Act.
25. Sections 391(4), 391(6) and 391(7) of the Act apply to the publication of information
about the matter to which this Notice relates. Under those provisions, the Authority
must publish such information about the matter to which this Notice relates as the
Authority considers appropriate. The information may be published in such manner as
the Authority considers appropriate. However, the Authority may not publish
information if such publication would, in the opinion of the Authority, be unfair to you
or prejudicial to the interests of consumers or detrimental to the stability of the UK
financial system.
26. The Authority intends to publish such information about the matter to which this Final
Notice relates as it considers appropriate.
Authority contacts
For more information concerning this matter generally, contact Alexander MacDermott,
Authorisations
at
the
Authority
(direct
line:
020
7066
0264
/
email:
alexander.macdermott@fca.org.uk).
Alex MacDermott
Executive Decision Maker
ANNEX A – REGULATORY PROVISIONS RELEVANT TO THIS FINAL NOTICE
1. Section 55A(1) of the Act provides for an application for permission to carry on one
or more regulated activities to be made to the appropriate regulator. Section
55A(2) defines the “appropriate regulator” for different applications.
2. Section 55B(3) of the Act provides that, in giving or varying permission, imposing
or varying a requirement, or giving consent, under any provision of Part 4A of the
Act, each regulator must ensure that the person concerned will satisfy, and
continue to satisfy, in relation to all of the regulated activities for which the person
has or will have permission, the threshold conditions for which that regulator is
responsible.
3. The threshold conditions are set out in schedule 6 of the Act. In brief, the threshold
conditions relate to:
(1)
Threshold condition 2B: Location of offices
(2)
Threshold condition 2C: Effective supervision
(3)
Threshold condition 2D: Appropriate resources
(4)
Threshold condition 2E: Suitability
(5)
Threshold condition 2F: Business model
Relevant provisions of the Authority’s Handbook
Threshold Conditions – COND
Threshold Condition 2C: Effective Supervision
1. COND 2.3.3G states that, in assessing the threshold condition set out in paragraph
2C of Schedule 6 to the Act, factors which the Authority will take into consideration
include, among other things, whether it is likely that the Authority will receive
adequate information from the firm to determine whether it is complying with the
requirements and standards under the regulatory system for which the Authority
is responsible and to identify and assess the impact on its statutory objectives; this
will include consideration of whether the firm is ready, willing and organised to
comply with Principle 11 (Relations with regulators) and the rules in SUP on the
provision of information to the Authority.
Threshold condition 2D: Appropriate Resources
2. COND 2.4.2G(2) states that the Authority will interpret the term 'appropriate' as
meaning sufficient in terms of quantity, quality and availability, and 'resources' as
including all financial resources (though only in the case of firms not carrying on,
or seeking to carry on, a PRA-regulated activity), non-financial resources and
means of managing its resources; for example, capital, provisions against liabilities,
holdings of or access to cash and other liquid assets, human resources and effective
means by which to manage risks.
3. COND 2.4.2G(2A) provides that, ‘non-financial resources’ of the firm include human
resources it has available.
4. COND 2.4.2G (3) states that high level systems and control requirements are in
SYSC. The Authority will consider whether the firm is ready, willing and organised
to comply with these and other applicable systems and controls requirements when
assessing if it has appropriate non-financial resources for the purpose of the
threshold conditions set out in threshold condition 2D.
Threshold condition 2E: Suitability
5. COND 2.5.2G(2) states that the Authority will also take into consideration anything
that could influence a firm's continuing ability to satisfy the threshold conditions
set out in paragraphs 2E and 3D of Schedule 6 to the Act. Examples include the
firm's position within a UK or international group, information provided by overseas
regulators about the firm, and the firm's plans to seek to vary its Part 4A permission
to carry on additional regulated activities once it has been granted that permission.
6. COND 2.5.4G(2)(c)G states that examples of the kind of general considerations to
which the Authority may have regard when assessing whether a firm will satisfy,
and continue to satisfy, threshold condition 2E include, but are not limited to,
whether the firm can demonstrate that it conducts, or will conduct, its business
with integrity and in compliance with proper standards.
7. COND 2.5.6G provides that examples of the kind of particular considerations to
which the Authority may have regard when assessing whether a firm will satisfy,
and continue to satisfy, this threshold condition include, but are not limited to,
whether the firm has been open and co-operative in all its dealings with the
Authority and any other regulatory body (see Principle 11 (Relations with
regulators)) and is ready, willing and organised to comply with the requirements
and standards under the regulatory system (such as the detailed requirements of
SYSC and, in relation to a firm not carrying on, or seeking to carry on, a PRA-
regulated activity only, the Prudential Standards part of the Authority’s
Handbook)in addition to other legal, regulatory and professional obligations; the
relevant requirements and standards will depend on the circumstances of each
case, including the regulated activities which the firm has permission, or is seeking
permission, to carry on.
ACTION
1. By an application dated 24 September 2020, Buttercup Finance Ltd (“Buttercup”)
applied under section 55A of the Act for Part 4A permission to carry on the regulated
activities of:
a)
Agreeing to carry on a regulated activity
b)
Limited permission credit broking.
2. The Application is incomplete.
3. For the reasons listed below, the Authority has refused the Application.
SUMMARY OF REASONS
4. Buttercup has failed to respond to requests for the provision of information considered
by the Authority to be necessary to allow the Application to be determined. The last
request included a statement to the effect that Buttercup must contact the Authority
within 10 business days, or the Authority would issue Buttercup with a Warning Notice.
No response was received.
5. By its Warning Notice dated 07 October 2021 the Authority gave notice that it proposed
to refuse the Application and that Buttercup was entitled to make representations to
the Authority about that proposed action.
6. As no representations have been received by the Authority from Buttercup within the
time allowed by the Warning Notice, the default procedures in paragraph 2.3.2 of the
Authority’s Decision Procedure and Penalties Manual apply, permitting the Authority to
treat the matters referred to in its Warning Notice as undisputed and, accordingly, to
give a Decision Notice.
7. By its Decision Notice dated 19 November 2021 (“The Decision Notice”), the Authority
gave Buttercup notice that it had decided to take the action described above.
8. Buttercup had 28 days from the date the Decision Notice was given to refer the matter
to the Upper Tribunal (formerly known as the Financial Services and Markets Tribunal).
No referral was made to the Upper Tribunal within this period of time or to date.
9. Under section 390 (1) of the Act, the Authority having decided to refuse the Application
and there having been no reference of that decision to the Tribunal, must give
Buttercup Final Notice of its refusal.
10. The Authority decided to refuse the Application and to give this Final notice as
Buttercup has failed to provide the information required by the Authority and, in the
absence of the information sought, the Authority cannot ensure that Buttercup will
satisfy, and continue to satisfy, the threshold conditions set out in Schedule 6 of the
Act, specifically:
a) That the firm can be effectively supervised by the Authority as required by
threshold condition 2C;
b) That the firm has appropriate human resources, given Buttercup’s failure to provide
the Authority with the requested information as required by threshold condition
2D; and
c) That the firm will conduct its business with integrity and in compliance with proper
standards as required by threshold condition 2E.
DEFINITIONS
11. The definitions below are used in this Final Notice.
“the Act” means the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
“the Application” means the application referred to in paragraph [1]/[2] above.
“the Authority” means the body corporate previously known as the Financial
Services Authority and renamed on 1 April 2013 as the Financial Conduct Authority.
“the Warning Notice” means the warning notice dated 07 October 2021 given to
the applicant by the Authority.
“Buttercup” means Buttercup Finance Ltd
FACTS AND MATTERS
12. The Application was received by the Authority on 24 September 2020.
13. Further information was requested from Buttercup under section 55U(5) of the Act.
14. On 5 July 2021, the Authority asked Buttercup to consider withdrawing its application
for limited permission consumer credit permissions. This request was made because
Buttercup appeared to be a primary credit broker, and therefore required full
permission consumer credit permissions. The Authority cannot do this for the applicant.
15. Buttercup failed to provide a response by the deadline of 12 July 2021.
16. Between 21 July 2021 and 3 August 2021, the Authority attempted to contact
Buttercup by telephone on 4 separate occasions. No contact was made in respect of
any of these attempts.
17. On 11 August 2021 and 13 September 2021, the Authority sent a letter to Buttercup
by email and by recorded delivery, noting the lack of a response to its requests for the
information and informing it that a failure to provide the information would result in
the Application being determined based upon the information received to date, and
that this might result in the Authority issuing Buttercup with a Warning Notice
proposing to refuse the Application. Buttercup failed to respond by the stated deadlines
of 27 August 2021 and 27 September 2021 respectively.
18. On 07 October 2021 a Warning Notice was issued by the Authority advising Buttercup
that it proposed to refuse the Application and that Buttercup was entitled to make
representations to the Authority about that proposed action.
19. As no representations have been received by the Authority from Buttercup within the
time allowed by the Warning Notice, the default procedures in paragraph 2.3.2 of the
Authority’s Decision Procedure and Penalties Manual apply, permitting the Authority to
treat the matters referred to in its Warning Notice as undisputed and, accordingly, to
give a Decision Notice.
IMPACT ON THE THRESHOLD CONDITIONS
20. Buttercup has failed to respond to 8 separate requests for the provision of information
considered by the Authority to be necessary to allow the Application to be determined.
The final request gave Buttercup 10 business days to respond and included a statement
to the effect that Buttercup must contact the Authority, or the Authority would issue
Buttercup with a Warning Notice. As no response was received to that final request a
warning notice was issued.
21. The Authority must therefore determine the Application based upon the information
received to date, in circumstances where its requests for information have not been
met. Having reviewed that information, the Authority cannot ensure that Buttercup
satisfies, and will continue to satisfy, the threshold conditions.
22. Authorised firms (and those seeking authorisation) are expected to engage with the
Authority in an open and cooperative way. The failure to provide the requested
information raises concerns that Buttercup would fail to do so if the Application were
to be granted.
23. The failure to provide the information raises concerns as to whether Buttercup:
a. can be effectively supervised by the Authority as required by threshold
condition 2C;
b. has appropriate human resources, given Buttercup’s failure to provide the
Authority with the requested information as required by threshold condition
2D; and
c. will conduct its business with integrity and in compliance with proper
standards as required by threshold condition 2E.
PROCEDURAL MATTERS
24. This Final Notice is given under section 390 (1) of the Act.
25. Sections 391(4), 391(6) and 391(7) of the Act apply to the publication of information
about the matter to which this Notice relates. Under those provisions, the Authority
must publish such information about the matter to which this Notice relates as the
Authority considers appropriate. The information may be published in such manner as
the Authority considers appropriate. However, the Authority may not publish
information if such publication would, in the opinion of the Authority, be unfair to you
or prejudicial to the interests of consumers or detrimental to the stability of the UK
financial system.
26. The Authority intends to publish such information about the matter to which this Final
Notice relates as it considers appropriate.
Authority contacts
For more information concerning this matter generally, contact Alexander MacDermott,
Authorisations
at
the
Authority
(direct
line:
020
7066
0264
/
email:
alexander.macdermott@fca.org.uk).
Alex MacDermott
Executive Decision Maker
ANNEX A – REGULATORY PROVISIONS RELEVANT TO THIS FINAL NOTICE
1. Section 55A(1) of the Act provides for an application for permission to carry on one
or more regulated activities to be made to the appropriate regulator. Section
55A(2) defines the “appropriate regulator” for different applications.
2. Section 55B(3) of the Act provides that, in giving or varying permission, imposing
or varying a requirement, or giving consent, under any provision of Part 4A of the
Act, each regulator must ensure that the person concerned will satisfy, and
continue to satisfy, in relation to all of the regulated activities for which the person
has or will have permission, the threshold conditions for which that regulator is
responsible.
3. The threshold conditions are set out in schedule 6 of the Act. In brief, the threshold
conditions relate to:
(1)
Threshold condition 2B: Location of offices
(2)
Threshold condition 2C: Effective supervision
(3)
Threshold condition 2D: Appropriate resources
(4)
Threshold condition 2E: Suitability
(5)
Threshold condition 2F: Business model
Relevant provisions of the Authority’s Handbook
Threshold Conditions – COND
Threshold Condition 2C: Effective Supervision
1. COND 2.3.3G states that, in assessing the threshold condition set out in paragraph
2C of Schedule 6 to the Act, factors which the Authority will take into consideration
include, among other things, whether it is likely that the Authority will receive
adequate information from the firm to determine whether it is complying with the
requirements and standards under the regulatory system for which the Authority
is responsible and to identify and assess the impact on its statutory objectives; this
will include consideration of whether the firm is ready, willing and organised to
comply with Principle 11 (Relations with regulators) and the rules in SUP on the
provision of information to the Authority.
Threshold condition 2D: Appropriate Resources
2. COND 2.4.2G(2) states that the Authority will interpret the term 'appropriate' as
meaning sufficient in terms of quantity, quality and availability, and 'resources' as
including all financial resources (though only in the case of firms not carrying on,
or seeking to carry on, a PRA-regulated activity), non-financial resources and
means of managing its resources; for example, capital, provisions against liabilities,
holdings of or access to cash and other liquid assets, human resources and effective
means by which to manage risks.
3. COND 2.4.2G(2A) provides that, ‘non-financial resources’ of the firm include human
resources it has available.
4. COND 2.4.2G (3) states that high level systems and control requirements are in
SYSC. The Authority will consider whether the firm is ready, willing and organised
to comply with these and other applicable systems and controls requirements when
assessing if it has appropriate non-financial resources for the purpose of the
threshold conditions set out in threshold condition 2D.
Threshold condition 2E: Suitability
5. COND 2.5.2G(2) states that the Authority will also take into consideration anything
that could influence a firm's continuing ability to satisfy the threshold conditions
set out in paragraphs 2E and 3D of Schedule 6 to the Act. Examples include the
firm's position within a UK or international group, information provided by overseas
regulators about the firm, and the firm's plans to seek to vary its Part 4A permission
to carry on additional regulated activities once it has been granted that permission.
6. COND 2.5.4G(2)(c)G states that examples of the kind of general considerations to
which the Authority may have regard when assessing whether a firm will satisfy,
and continue to satisfy, threshold condition 2E include, but are not limited to,
whether the firm can demonstrate that it conducts, or will conduct, its business
with integrity and in compliance with proper standards.
7. COND 2.5.6G provides that examples of the kind of particular considerations to
which the Authority may have regard when assessing whether a firm will satisfy,
and continue to satisfy, this threshold condition include, but are not limited to,
whether the firm has been open and co-operative in all its dealings with the
Authority and any other regulatory body (see Principle 11 (Relations with
regulators)) and is ready, willing and organised to comply with the requirements
and standards under the regulatory system (such as the detailed requirements of
SYSC and, in relation to a firm not carrying on, or seeking to carry on, a PRA-
regulated activity only, the Prudential Standards part of the Authority’s
Handbook)in addition to other legal, regulatory and professional obligations; the
relevant requirements and standards will depend on the circumstances of each
case, including the regulated activities which the firm has permission, or is seeking
permission, to carry on.