Final Notice
On , the Financial Conduct Authority issued a Final Notice to C2 MOTOR GROUP LTD
Document1
FINAL NOTICE
C2 MOTOR GROUP LTD
Joyce Green Farm
Joyce Green Lane
Dartford
DA1 5PN
UNITED KINGDOM
ACTION
1. By an application dated 21 February 2022 (“the Application”), C2 Motor Group Ltd
(“C2 Motor Group” or “the Applicant”) applied under section 55A of the Act for Part
4A permission to carry on the regulated activities of:
a.
Agreeing to carry on a regulated activity;
b.
Credit broking;
c.
Debt adjusting; and
d.
Debt counselling.
2. The Application is incomplete.
3. For the reasons above, the Authority has refused the Application.
SUMMARY OF REASONS
4. By its Warning Notice the Authority gave notice that it proposed to refuse the
Application and that C2 Motor Group was entitled to make a representation to the
Authority about that proposed action.
5. No representations were received by the Authority from C2 Motor Group within the
time allowed by the Warning Notice, therefore the default procedures in paragraph
2.3.2 of the Authority’s Decision Procedure and Penalties Manual applied, permitting
the Authority to treat the matters referred to in its Warning Notice as undisputed
and, accordingly, to give a Decision Notice.
6. By that Decision Notice, the Authority decided to refuse the Application. C2 Motor
Group had 28 days from the date of the Decision Notice to refer the matter to the
Tribunal. No referral was made to the Tribunal.
7. Under section 390(1) of the Act, the Authority, having decided to refuse the
Application and there having been no reference of that decision to the Tribunal,
must give C2 Motor Group a Final Notice.
8. In the Application, C2 Motor Group failed to disclose 3 of 7 current or previous
directorships of its sole director and controller, Mr Rodney Johnson. One of those
directorships was of C2 Group Ltd (“C2 Group”), which had its permission cancelled
by the Authority in a Final Notice dated 4 May 2018.
9. Mr Johnson falsely answered ‘no’ to questions in the Individual Controller Form
relating to whether he had ever been the director or controller of a company which
had had its authorisation revoked, been the subject of any disciplinary or
interventional action or been warned that such action might be taken. Mr Johnson
was the director and controller of C2 Group when the Authority cancelled its
permission.
10. The Authority must therefore determine the Application based upon the information
received to date. Having reviewed that information, the Authority cannot ensure
that C2 Motor Group satisfies, and will continue to satisfy, the threshold conditions.
11. The non-disclosure of the connection to C2 Group, Mr Johnson’s false answers to
questions in the Application and the lack of response to correspondence lead the
Authority to consider that C2 Motor Group:
a. is not a fit and proper person having regard to all the circumstances,
including in particular its connection to C2 Group and Mr Johnson;
b. cannot be effectively supervised by the Authority;
c. has not been open and co-operative in all its dealings with the Authority and
is not ready, willing and organised to comply with the requirements of the
regulatory system; and
d. if given permission, might repeat the sort of conduct which led to the
Authority cancelling C2 Group’s permission.
12. The Authority considers that C2 Motor Group does not meet the Suitability or
Effective Supervision Threshold Conditions. It therefore has decided to refuse the
application.
DEFINITIONS
13. The definitions below are used in this Final Notice.
“the Act” means the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000;
“the Application” means the application referred to in paragraph 1 above;
“the Authority” means the body corporate previously known as the Financial
Services Authority and renamed on 1 April 2013 as the Financial Conduct Authority;
“C2 Motor Group” means C2 Motor Group Ltd (company number: 13752921);
“C2 Group” means C2 Group Ltd (company number: 08943884);
“COND” means the Threshold Conditions section of the Authority’s handbook;
“the Executive Decision Maker” means the member of the Authority’s staff acting
under executive procedures as described in Chapter 4 of the Decision Procedure and
Penalties Manual in the Authority’s Handbook;
“SUP” means the Supervision section of the Authority’s handbook;
“SYSC” means the Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and Controls
section of the Authority’s handbook; and
“the Tribunal” means the Upper Tribunal (Tax & Chancery Chamber).
FACTS AND MATTERS
14. C2 Motor Group submitted the Application on 21 February 2022. An application was
also submitted for Rodney Johnson to hold the SMF29 (limited scope) controlled
function. Mr Johnson is C2 Motor Group’s sole director and controller.
15. C2 Motor Group applied to carry on the activities set out in paragraph 1. It applied
for limited permission credit broking, which would allow it to broke credit as the
supplier of goods or services carried on for the purposes of, or in connection with,
the sale of goods or the supply of services by C2 Motor Group to customers. It also
applied for debt adjusting and debt counselling permission limited to relevant credit
activity, as defined by paragraph 2G of Schedule 6 of the Act.
16. In the Application, C2 Motor Group failed to provide a full disclosure of directorships
held by Mr Johnson. It disclosed 4 directorships held by Mr Johnson in the last 10
years, including current directorships. However, Mr Johnson previously held and
currently holds the following other directorships, which were undisclosed on the
application form.
•
C2 Group Ltd
•
C2 Cars Ltd
•
C2 International Ltd
17. C2 Group was authorised and regulated by the Authority until 4 May 2018. By a
Final Notice of that date, the Authority cancelled C2 Group’s permission because it
had failed to comply with regulatory requirements to submit regulatory returns. It
also failed to pay outstanding fees to the Authority. Mr Johnson is and has been a
director of C2 Group since 21 September 2016.
18. The individual controller form completed by Mr Johnson asked:
In relation to activities regulated by the FCA or any other regulatory body […] has
the candidate or any company […] of which the candidate is or has been a
controller, director […], ever –
(a) Been refused, had revoked, restricted, been suspended from or terminated, any
licence, authorisations, registration, notification, membership or any other
permission granted by any such body?
(b) Been criticised, censured, disciplined, suspended, expelled, fined or been the
subject of any other disciplinary or interventional action by any such body?
(c) Received a warning (whether public or private) that such disciplinary or
interventional action may be taken against the candidate or the firm?
[….]
19. Mr Johnson answered ‘no’ to each of these questions. The Authority considers this
response was false because Mr Johnson was the controller and director of C2 Group
on 4 May 2018, when the Authority issued the Final Notice referenced above, and
for more than 18 months prior to that date.
20. The Individual Controller Form contains a declaration confirming that the
information in the form is accurate and complete to the best of the candidate’s
knowledge and belief, and that the candidate has read the explanatory notes. Mr
Johnson signed that declaration. In doing so he also confirmed that he understood it
is criminal offence to knowingly or recklessly provide to the Authority information
that is materially false, misleading or deceptive.
21. The Authority made numerous telephone calls to C2 Motor Group between 23 and
26 May 2022 and set out its concerns to C2 Motor Group in an email dated 26 May
2022. That email informed C2 Motor Group that, without its response, the
Application would be determined based on the information received to date, which
may result in a recommendation being made to refuse the Application.
22. C2 Motor Group has failed to respond to the Authority’s attempts to contact it.
23. No representations to the Decision Notice were received.
IMPACT ON THRESHOLD CONDITIONS
24. The regulatory provisions relevant to this Final Notice are referred to in Annex A.
25. In light of the facts and matters set out above and for the reasons set out below,
the Authority cannot ensure that, if the Application were granted, C2 Motor Group
would satisfy, and continue to satisfy the Suitability Threshold Condition and the
Effective Supervision Threshold Condition.
26. The Authority expects Applicants to be open and cooperative in disclosing matters
which might affect fitness and propriety. It is a criminal offence to knowingly or
recklessly provide information which is materially false, misleading or deceptive.
27. Mr Johnson’s false declarations and non-disclosure in relation to C2 Group indicate
to the Authority that he is not a fit and proper person.
Suitability Threshold Condition
28. C2 Motor Group has not satisfied the Authority that it is a fit and proper person
having regard to all the circumstances, including its connection with C2 Group and
Mr Johnson.
29. COND 2.5.6.G, which relates to the Suitability Threshold Condition, provides
examples of the kind of particular considerations to which the FCA may have regard
when assessing whether a firm will satisfy, and continue to satisfy, this threshold
condition. This includes, but is not limited to, whether:
(1) the firm has been open and co-operative in all its dealings with the [Authority]
and any other regulatory body […] and is ready, willing and organised to comply
with the requirements and standards under the regulatory system […];
(2) […];
(3) the firm has been the subject of, or connected to the subject of, any existing or
previous investigation or enforcement proceedings by the [Authority] […];
(4) the firm has contravened, or is connected with a person who has contravened,
any provisions of […] the regulatory system […];
(5) the firm, or a person connected with the firm, has been refused registration,
authorisation, membership or licence to carry out a trade, business or profession
or has had that registration, authorisation, membership or licence revoked,
withdrawn or terminated, or has been expelled by a regulatory or government
body [….]
30. C2 Motor Group is connected to C2 Group because Mr Johnson is the sole director
and controller of C2 Motor Group and was a director and controller of C2 Group at
the time C2 Group’s permission was cancelled by the Authority. C2 Group was the
subject of enforcement proceedings by the Authority, which resulted in the
cancellation of its permission. C2 Motor Group and Mr Johnson failed to disclose this
connection to the Authority and Mr Johnson has provided false declarations to the
Authority in relation to it.
31. In light of these matters, the Authority is not satisfied that C2 Motor Group is a fit
and proper person to carry on the regulated activities for which it seeks permission
and cannot be satisfied that C2 Motor Group is ready, willing and organised to
comply with the requirements and standards under the regulatory system.
32. The above concerns mean that C2 Motor Group has not demonstrated that it meets
the Suitability Threshold Condition.
Effective Supervision Threshold Condition
33. A firm must be capable of being effectively supervised by the Authority having
regard to all the circumstances. When assessing this threshold condition, the
Authority will take into consideration whether it is likely that the Authority will
receive adequate information from C2 Motor Group to enable it to determine
whether it is complying with the requirements and standards under the regulatory
system, for which the Authority is responsible, and to identify and assess the
impact on its statutory objective.
34. As explained above, C2 Motor Group is connected to C2 Group, which was
previously regulated by the Authority and was referred to Enforcement for failure to
submit regulatory returns. It failed to respond to the Authority’s repeated attempts
to contact it, and as a result, its permission was cancelled. Mr Johnson is presently
a director of both C2 Group and C2 Motor Group.
35. The Authority is concerned that should C2 Motor Group be authorised, it may also
not submit its regulatory returns in a timely manner or at all. C2 Motor Group has
also failed to respond to the Authority’s attempt to contact it in relation to the
Application.
36. Furthermore, C2 Motor Group has failed to disclose its connection to C2 Group and
the previous enforcement action by the Authority. This suggests it will not be open
and cooperative in all its dealing with the Authority, as required by Principle 11, and
it may not be capable of being effectively supervised by the Authority.
37. The above concerns mean that C2 Motor Group has not demonstrated that it meets
the Effective Supervision Threshold Condition.
38. On the basis of the facts and matters described above, the Authority cannot ensure
that C2 Motor Group will satisfy, and continue to satisfy, the threshold conditions in
relation to all of the regulated activities for which C2 Motor Group would have
permission if the application was granted. The Authority accordingly has refused the
application.
IMPORTANT NOTICES
39. This Final Notice is given under section 390 (1) of the Act.
40. Sections 391(4), 391(6) and 391(7) of the Act apply to the publication of
information about the matter to which this Notice relates. Under those provisions,
the Authority must publish such information about the matter to which this Notice
relates as the Authority considers appropriate. The information may be published in
such manner as the Authority considers appropriate. However, the Authority may
not publish information if such publication would, in the opinion of the Authority, be
unfair to you or prejudicial to the interests of consumers or detrimental to the
stability of the UK financial system. 39. The Authority intends to publish such
information about the matter to which this Final Notice relates as it considers
appropriate.
41. The Authority intends to publish such information about the matter to which this
Final Notice relates as it considers appropriate.
Authority contacts
42. For more information concerning this matter generally, contact Ana Marulanda,
Manager, Credit & Lending, at the Authority (direct line: 020 7066 4724 / email:
Ana.Marulanda@fca.org.uk).
FINAL NOTICE
C2 MOTOR GROUP LTD
Joyce Green Farm
Joyce Green Lane
Dartford
DA1 5PN
UNITED KINGDOM
ACTION
1. By an application dated 21 February 2022 (“the Application”), C2 Motor Group Ltd
(“C2 Motor Group” or “the Applicant”) applied under section 55A of the Act for Part
4A permission to carry on the regulated activities of:
a.
Agreeing to carry on a regulated activity;
b.
Credit broking;
c.
Debt adjusting; and
d.
Debt counselling.
2. The Application is incomplete.
3. For the reasons above, the Authority has refused the Application.
SUMMARY OF REASONS
4. By its Warning Notice the Authority gave notice that it proposed to refuse the
Application and that C2 Motor Group was entitled to make a representation to the
Authority about that proposed action.
5. No representations were received by the Authority from C2 Motor Group within the
time allowed by the Warning Notice, therefore the default procedures in paragraph
2.3.2 of the Authority’s Decision Procedure and Penalties Manual applied, permitting
the Authority to treat the matters referred to in its Warning Notice as undisputed
and, accordingly, to give a Decision Notice.
6. By that Decision Notice, the Authority decided to refuse the Application. C2 Motor
Group had 28 days from the date of the Decision Notice to refer the matter to the
Tribunal. No referral was made to the Tribunal.
7. Under section 390(1) of the Act, the Authority, having decided to refuse the
Application and there having been no reference of that decision to the Tribunal,
must give C2 Motor Group a Final Notice.
8. In the Application, C2 Motor Group failed to disclose 3 of 7 current or previous
directorships of its sole director and controller, Mr Rodney Johnson. One of those
directorships was of C2 Group Ltd (“C2 Group”), which had its permission cancelled
by the Authority in a Final Notice dated 4 May 2018.
9. Mr Johnson falsely answered ‘no’ to questions in the Individual Controller Form
relating to whether he had ever been the director or controller of a company which
had had its authorisation revoked, been the subject of any disciplinary or
interventional action or been warned that such action might be taken. Mr Johnson
was the director and controller of C2 Group when the Authority cancelled its
permission.
10. The Authority must therefore determine the Application based upon the information
received to date. Having reviewed that information, the Authority cannot ensure
that C2 Motor Group satisfies, and will continue to satisfy, the threshold conditions.
11. The non-disclosure of the connection to C2 Group, Mr Johnson’s false answers to
questions in the Application and the lack of response to correspondence lead the
Authority to consider that C2 Motor Group:
a. is not a fit and proper person having regard to all the circumstances,
including in particular its connection to C2 Group and Mr Johnson;
b. cannot be effectively supervised by the Authority;
c. has not been open and co-operative in all its dealings with the Authority and
is not ready, willing and organised to comply with the requirements of the
regulatory system; and
d. if given permission, might repeat the sort of conduct which led to the
Authority cancelling C2 Group’s permission.
12. The Authority considers that C2 Motor Group does not meet the Suitability or
Effective Supervision Threshold Conditions. It therefore has decided to refuse the
application.
DEFINITIONS
13. The definitions below are used in this Final Notice.
“the Act” means the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000;
“the Application” means the application referred to in paragraph 1 above;
“the Authority” means the body corporate previously known as the Financial
Services Authority and renamed on 1 April 2013 as the Financial Conduct Authority;
“C2 Motor Group” means C2 Motor Group Ltd (company number: 13752921);
“C2 Group” means C2 Group Ltd (company number: 08943884);
“COND” means the Threshold Conditions section of the Authority’s handbook;
“the Executive Decision Maker” means the member of the Authority’s staff acting
under executive procedures as described in Chapter 4 of the Decision Procedure and
Penalties Manual in the Authority’s Handbook;
“SUP” means the Supervision section of the Authority’s handbook;
“SYSC” means the Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and Controls
section of the Authority’s handbook; and
“the Tribunal” means the Upper Tribunal (Tax & Chancery Chamber).
FACTS AND MATTERS
14. C2 Motor Group submitted the Application on 21 February 2022. An application was
also submitted for Rodney Johnson to hold the SMF29 (limited scope) controlled
function. Mr Johnson is C2 Motor Group’s sole director and controller.
15. C2 Motor Group applied to carry on the activities set out in paragraph 1. It applied
for limited permission credit broking, which would allow it to broke credit as the
supplier of goods or services carried on for the purposes of, or in connection with,
the sale of goods or the supply of services by C2 Motor Group to customers. It also
applied for debt adjusting and debt counselling permission limited to relevant credit
activity, as defined by paragraph 2G of Schedule 6 of the Act.
16. In the Application, C2 Motor Group failed to provide a full disclosure of directorships
held by Mr Johnson. It disclosed 4 directorships held by Mr Johnson in the last 10
years, including current directorships. However, Mr Johnson previously held and
currently holds the following other directorships, which were undisclosed on the
application form.
•
C2 Group Ltd
•
C2 Cars Ltd
•
C2 International Ltd
17. C2 Group was authorised and regulated by the Authority until 4 May 2018. By a
Final Notice of that date, the Authority cancelled C2 Group’s permission because it
had failed to comply with regulatory requirements to submit regulatory returns. It
also failed to pay outstanding fees to the Authority. Mr Johnson is and has been a
director of C2 Group since 21 September 2016.
18. The individual controller form completed by Mr Johnson asked:
In relation to activities regulated by the FCA or any other regulatory body […] has
the candidate or any company […] of which the candidate is or has been a
controller, director […], ever –
(a) Been refused, had revoked, restricted, been suspended from or terminated, any
licence, authorisations, registration, notification, membership or any other
permission granted by any such body?
(b) Been criticised, censured, disciplined, suspended, expelled, fined or been the
subject of any other disciplinary or interventional action by any such body?
(c) Received a warning (whether public or private) that such disciplinary or
interventional action may be taken against the candidate or the firm?
[….]
19. Mr Johnson answered ‘no’ to each of these questions. The Authority considers this
response was false because Mr Johnson was the controller and director of C2 Group
on 4 May 2018, when the Authority issued the Final Notice referenced above, and
for more than 18 months prior to that date.
20. The Individual Controller Form contains a declaration confirming that the
information in the form is accurate and complete to the best of the candidate’s
knowledge and belief, and that the candidate has read the explanatory notes. Mr
Johnson signed that declaration. In doing so he also confirmed that he understood it
is criminal offence to knowingly or recklessly provide to the Authority information
that is materially false, misleading or deceptive.
21. The Authority made numerous telephone calls to C2 Motor Group between 23 and
26 May 2022 and set out its concerns to C2 Motor Group in an email dated 26 May
2022. That email informed C2 Motor Group that, without its response, the
Application would be determined based on the information received to date, which
may result in a recommendation being made to refuse the Application.
22. C2 Motor Group has failed to respond to the Authority’s attempts to contact it.
23. No representations to the Decision Notice were received.
IMPACT ON THRESHOLD CONDITIONS
24. The regulatory provisions relevant to this Final Notice are referred to in Annex A.
25. In light of the facts and matters set out above and for the reasons set out below,
the Authority cannot ensure that, if the Application were granted, C2 Motor Group
would satisfy, and continue to satisfy the Suitability Threshold Condition and the
Effective Supervision Threshold Condition.
26. The Authority expects Applicants to be open and cooperative in disclosing matters
which might affect fitness and propriety. It is a criminal offence to knowingly or
recklessly provide information which is materially false, misleading or deceptive.
27. Mr Johnson’s false declarations and non-disclosure in relation to C2 Group indicate
to the Authority that he is not a fit and proper person.
Suitability Threshold Condition
28. C2 Motor Group has not satisfied the Authority that it is a fit and proper person
having regard to all the circumstances, including its connection with C2 Group and
Mr Johnson.
29. COND 2.5.6.G, which relates to the Suitability Threshold Condition, provides
examples of the kind of particular considerations to which the FCA may have regard
when assessing whether a firm will satisfy, and continue to satisfy, this threshold
condition. This includes, but is not limited to, whether:
(1) the firm has been open and co-operative in all its dealings with the [Authority]
and any other regulatory body […] and is ready, willing and organised to comply
with the requirements and standards under the regulatory system […];
(2) […];
(3) the firm has been the subject of, or connected to the subject of, any existing or
previous investigation or enforcement proceedings by the [Authority] […];
(4) the firm has contravened, or is connected with a person who has contravened,
any provisions of […] the regulatory system […];
(5) the firm, or a person connected with the firm, has been refused registration,
authorisation, membership or licence to carry out a trade, business or profession
or has had that registration, authorisation, membership or licence revoked,
withdrawn or terminated, or has been expelled by a regulatory or government
body [….]
30. C2 Motor Group is connected to C2 Group because Mr Johnson is the sole director
and controller of C2 Motor Group and was a director and controller of C2 Group at
the time C2 Group’s permission was cancelled by the Authority. C2 Group was the
subject of enforcement proceedings by the Authority, which resulted in the
cancellation of its permission. C2 Motor Group and Mr Johnson failed to disclose this
connection to the Authority and Mr Johnson has provided false declarations to the
Authority in relation to it.
31. In light of these matters, the Authority is not satisfied that C2 Motor Group is a fit
and proper person to carry on the regulated activities for which it seeks permission
and cannot be satisfied that C2 Motor Group is ready, willing and organised to
comply with the requirements and standards under the regulatory system.
32. The above concerns mean that C2 Motor Group has not demonstrated that it meets
the Suitability Threshold Condition.
Effective Supervision Threshold Condition
33. A firm must be capable of being effectively supervised by the Authority having
regard to all the circumstances. When assessing this threshold condition, the
Authority will take into consideration whether it is likely that the Authority will
receive adequate information from C2 Motor Group to enable it to determine
whether it is complying with the requirements and standards under the regulatory
system, for which the Authority is responsible, and to identify and assess the
impact on its statutory objective.
34. As explained above, C2 Motor Group is connected to C2 Group, which was
previously regulated by the Authority and was referred to Enforcement for failure to
submit regulatory returns. It failed to respond to the Authority’s repeated attempts
to contact it, and as a result, its permission was cancelled. Mr Johnson is presently
a director of both C2 Group and C2 Motor Group.
35. The Authority is concerned that should C2 Motor Group be authorised, it may also
not submit its regulatory returns in a timely manner or at all. C2 Motor Group has
also failed to respond to the Authority’s attempt to contact it in relation to the
Application.
36. Furthermore, C2 Motor Group has failed to disclose its connection to C2 Group and
the previous enforcement action by the Authority. This suggests it will not be open
and cooperative in all its dealing with the Authority, as required by Principle 11, and
it may not be capable of being effectively supervised by the Authority.
37. The above concerns mean that C2 Motor Group has not demonstrated that it meets
the Effective Supervision Threshold Condition.
38. On the basis of the facts and matters described above, the Authority cannot ensure
that C2 Motor Group will satisfy, and continue to satisfy, the threshold conditions in
relation to all of the regulated activities for which C2 Motor Group would have
permission if the application was granted. The Authority accordingly has refused the
application.
IMPORTANT NOTICES
39. This Final Notice is given under section 390 (1) of the Act.
40. Sections 391(4), 391(6) and 391(7) of the Act apply to the publication of
information about the matter to which this Notice relates. Under those provisions,
the Authority must publish such information about the matter to which this Notice
relates as the Authority considers appropriate. The information may be published in
such manner as the Authority considers appropriate. However, the Authority may
not publish information if such publication would, in the opinion of the Authority, be
unfair to you or prejudicial to the interests of consumers or detrimental to the
stability of the UK financial system. 39. The Authority intends to publish such
information about the matter to which this Final Notice relates as it considers
appropriate.
41. The Authority intends to publish such information about the matter to which this
Final Notice relates as it considers appropriate.
Authority contacts
42. For more information concerning this matter generally, contact Ana Marulanda,
Manager, Credit & Lending, at the Authority (direct line: 020 7066 4724 / email:
Ana.Marulanda@fca.org.uk).