Page 1 of 7

FINAL NOTICE

_________________________________________________________


To:

Church Hill Finance (Anthony Badaloo trading as)

ACTION

1.
For the reasons set out in this Final Notice, the Authority hereby takes the
following action against Mr Badaloo.


2.
The Authority issued to Mr Badaloo the Decision Notice which notified Mr Badaloo
that, for the reasons given below and pursuant to section 55J of the Act, the
Authority had decided to cancel Mr Badaloo’s Part 4A permission.

3.
On 11 November 2016, Mr Badaloo referred the matter to the Tribunal.


4.
On 7 March 2017, the Authority submitted an application to the Tribunal to strike
out Mr Badaloo’s reference on the basis that Mr Badaloo’s reference had no
reasonable prospect of success. On 24 April 2017, the Tribunal issued a decision
in which it accepted the Authority’s application, and struck out Mr Badaloo’s
reference.


5.
On 3 May 2017, Mr Badaloo applied to the Tribunal for permission to appeal the
Tribunal’s decision. On 8 May 2017, the Tribunal refused Mr Badaloo’s application

Church Hill Finance (Anthony Badaloo trading as)
9 November 2017

Page 2 of 7

for permission to appeal, on the basis that the arguments Mr Badaloo advanced in
support of his appeal identified no arguable errors of law in the decision of the
Tribunal. On 10 May 2017, Mr Badaloo filed an application for permission to
appeal to the Court of Appeal.


6.
On 16 October 2017, the Court of Appeal issued the Order in which it refused Mr
Badaloo’s application for permission to appeal against the Tribunal’s decision to
strike out Mr Badaloo’s reference, on the basis that Mr Badaloo’s application was
“totally without merit”. The Order provides that the Court of Appeal’s decision is
final and cannot be further reviewed or appealed.


7.
Accordingly, the Authority has today cancelled Mr Badaloo’s Part 4A permission.


DEFINITIONS

8.
The definitions below are used in this Notice (and in the Annex):

“the Act” means the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000;

“the appropriate resources Threshold Condition” means the threshold condition
set out in Paragraph 2D of Schedule 6 to the Act;

“the Authority” means the Financial Conduct Authority;

“COND” means the Threshold Conditions part of the Handbook;

“the Decision Notice” means the Decision Notice dated 12 October 2016;

“EG” means the Authority’s Enforcement Guide;

“the Handbook” means the Authority’s Handbook of rules and guidance;

“Mr Badaloo” means Anthony Badaloo, a sole trader, whose trading name is
Church Hill Finance;

“Mr Badaloo’s Part 4A permission” means the permission granted to Mr Badaloo
under Part 4A of the Act;

“the Order” means the Order made by the Court of Appeal on 16 October 2017;

“the Principles” means the Authority’s Principles for Businesses;

“the suitability Threshold Condition” means the threshold condition set out in
paragraph 2E of Schedule 6 to the Act;

“SYSC” means the Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and Controls
sourcebook in the Handbook;

“the Threshold Conditions” means the threshold conditions set out in Schedule 6
to the Act;

“the Tribunal” means the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber); and

“the Warning Notice” means the Warning Notice dated 1 June 2016.




Church Hill Finance (Anthony Badaloo trading as)
9 November 2017

Page 3 of 7

RELEVANT STATUTORY AND REGULATORY PROVISIONS

9.
The statutory and regulatory provisions relevant to this Final Notice are set out in
the Annex.

SUMMARY OF REASONS

10.
The Authority has concluded, on the basis of the facts and matters and
conclusions described in the Warning Notice and the Decision Notice, that Mr
Badaloo is failing to satisfy the suitability Threshold Condition in that:

(a) Mr Badaloo, a sole trader, has since 13 April 2015 repeatedly failed to comply

fully, or at all, with the Authority’s reasonable requests to provide information
and documents to the Authority in relation to his business records and his
creditor position;

(b) Mr Badaloo has not been open and co-operative in all of his dealings with the

Authority, in breach of Principle 11 (Relations with regulators) of the
Principles; and


(c) On 2 October 2015, Mr Badaloo was convicted of one count of trespassing

and one count of theft, and on 30 October 2015, he was sentenced for those
offences to a Community Order of 100 hours of unpaid work, and ordered to
pay £3,500 in costs, plus a £60 victim surcharge. On this basis, the Authority
considers that Mr Badaloo cannot be expected to act with probity.

11.
In the light of these matters, the Authority considers that Mr Badaloo is not fit
and proper to have permission to conduct regulated activities.

FACTS AND MATTERS RELIED ON

12.
Mr Badaloo was authorised by the Authority on 29 October 2004 to conduct
designated investment business, and on 31 October 2004 he was also given
permission to conduct regulated home finance business.

13.
Mr Badaloo has since 13 April 2015 repeatedly failed to comply fully, or at all,
with reasonable requests by the Authority that he provide information and
documents to the Authority in relation to his business records and his creditor
position.


14.
In failing to provide information and documents to the Authority in relation to his
business records, Mr Badaloo failed to explain to the Authority what alternative
arrangements he has made to demonstrate that he satisfies his record-keeping
obligations under SYSC 9.1.1R, following the repossession of his principal place of
business on 7 November 2014 and the destruction of his business records on 24
June 2015.


15.
Further, Mr Badaloo’s failure to provide the information and documents to the
Authority in relation to his business records and his creditor position means that
the Authority is unable to assess whether Mr Badaloo’s financial and non-financial
resources are appropriate in relation to the regulated activities that he carries on
and therefore whether Mr Badaloo is satisfying the appropriate resources
Threshold Condition.


16.
On 2 October 2015, Mr Badaloo was convicted on indictment at Harrow Crown
Court of one count of trespassing, contrary to sections 144(1) and (5) of the

Church Hill Finance (Anthony Badaloo trading as)
9 November 2017

Page 4 of 7

Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment Act 2012, and one count of theft, contrary
to sections 1(1) and 7 of the Theft Act 1968.


17.
On 30 October 2015, Mr Badaloo was sentenced for those convictions at Harrow
Crown Court to a Community Order of 100 hours of unpaid work, and was
ordered to pay £3,500 in costs, plus a £60 victim surcharge.

18.
The Authority invited Mr Badaloo to apply to cancel his Part 4A permission, but Mr
Badaloo declined to do so.

FAILINGS

19.
Based on the facts and matters set out above, the Authority has concluded that
Mr Badaloo is failing to satisfy the suitability Threshold Condition. In particular:

(a)
Mr Badaloo’s unreasonable failure to provide the information requested by
the Authority leads the Authority to conclude that he is failing to be open
and co-operative with the Authority, in breach of Principle 11 (Relations
with regulators) of the Principles;

(b)
Mr Badaloo has failed to satisfy the Authority that he is ready, willing and
organised to comply with the requirements and standards under the
regulatory system (COND 2.5.6G(1)); and

(c)
On the basis of Mr Badaloo’s criminal convictions, the Authority concludes
that Mr Badaloo cannot be expected to act with probity (COND
2.5.1AUK(1)(e) and COND 2.5.6G(2)).

20.
In the light of these matters, the Authority is not satisfied that Mr Badaloo is a fit
and proper person having regard to all the circumstances. Accordingly, Mr
Badaloo’s Part 4A permission should be cancelled.


DECISION MAKER

21.
The decision which gave rise to the obligation to give this Final Notice was made
by the Regulatory Decisions Committee.


IMPORTANT

22.
This Final Notice is given to Mr Badaloo in accordance with section 390 of the Act.

Publicity

23.
The Authority must publish such information about the matter to which this Final
Notice relates as the Authority considers appropriate. The information may be
published in such manner as the Authority considers appropriate. However, the
Authority may not publish information if such publication would, in the opinion of
the Authority, be unfair to Mr Badaloo or prejudicial to the interest of consumers.


24.
The Authority intends to publish such information about the matter to which this
Final Notice relates as it considers appropriate.

Church Hill Finance (Anthony Badaloo trading as)
9 November 2017

Page 5 of 7

25.
For more information concerning this matter generally, please contact Roger
Hylton at the Authority (direct line: 020 7066 8168).

Anna Couzens
Enforcement and Market Oversight Division



Church Hill Finance (Anthony Badaloo trading as)
9 November 2017

Page 6 of 7

ANNEX

RELEVANT STATUTORY AND REGULATORY PROVISIONS

1.
The Authority’s operational objectives established in section 1B of the Act include
securing an appropriate degree of protection for consumers.

2.
The Authority is authorised by section 55J of the Act to, amongst other things,
cancel a firm’s Part 4A permission where it appears to the Authority that it is
failing to satisfy the Threshold Conditions.


3.
The appropriate resources Threshold Condition provides, in relation to a person
(“A”) carrying on or seeking to carry on regulated activities which do not consist
of or include a PRA-regulated activity, that:


“The resources of A must be appropriate in relation to the regulated
activities that A carries on or seeks to carry on.”

4.
The suitability Threshold Condition provides, in relation to a person (“A”) carrying
on or seeking to carry on regulated activities which do not consist of or include a
PRA-regulated activity, that:

“A must be a fit and proper person having regard to all the circumstances,
including-

(c)
the need to ensure that A’s affairs are conducted in an
appropriate manner, having regard in particular to the
interests of consumers and the integrity of the UK financial
system;

(d)
whether A has complied and is complying with … requests
made by the [Authority], relating to the provision of
information to the [Authority] …;

(e)
whether those who manage A’s affairs have adequate skills
and experience and have acted and may be expected to act
with probity;

5.
In exercising its power to cancel a Part 4A permission, the Authority must have
regard to the regulatory requirements and guidance published in the Handbook.
The main considerations relevant to the action stated in this Notice are set out
below.


Relevant Principle

6.
Principle 11 (Relations with regulators) of the Principles, states that a firm must
deal with its regulators in an open and cooperative way, and must disclose to the
appropriate regulator anything relating to the firm of which the regulator would
reasonably expect notice.


Church Hill Finance (Anthony Badaloo trading as)
9 November 2017

Page 7 of 7

Relevant rule

7.
SYSC 9.1.1R states:

“A firm must arrange for orderly records to be kept of its business and internal
organisation, including all services and transactions undertaken by it, which must
be sufficient to enable the appropriate regulator … to monitor the firm's
compliance with the requirements under the regulatory system, and in particular
to ascertain that the firm has complied with all obligations with respect to
clients.”

Guidance concerning the suitability Threshold Condition

COND 2.5 – Suitability: Paragraph 2E of Schedule 6 to the Act

8.
COND 2.5.1AUK(1) reproduces the relevant statutory provision that the person
concerned must satisfy the Authority that he is a fit and proper person having
regard to all the circumstances, including amongst other things: the need to
ensure his affairs are conducted in an appropriate manner, having regard in
particular to the interests of consumers; whether he has complied and is
complying with requests made by the Authority, relating to the provision of
information to the Authority; and whether those who manage his affairs have
adequate skills and experience and act with probity (COND 2.5.1AUK(1)(c),(d)
and (e)).


9.
COND 2.5.4G(2) states that examples of the considerations to which the
Authority may have regard when assessing whether a firm will satisfy and
continue to satisfy the Threshold Conditions include whether the firm conducts its
business with integrity and in compliance with proper standards (COND
2.5.4G(2)(a)).

10.
COND 2.5.6G gives examples of the kind of particular considerations to which the
Authority may have regard when assessing whether a firm will satisfy, and
continue to satisfy, the suitability Threshold Condition, including but not limited
to: (i) whether the firm has been open and co-operative in all its dealings with
the Authority and is ready, willing and organised to comply with the requirements
and standards under the regulatory system (COND 2.5.6G(1)); and (ii) whether
the firm has been convicted, or is connected with a person who has been
convicted, of any criminal offence, with particular consideration to be given to
offences of dishonesty, fraud or financial crime (COND 2.5.6G(2)).

The Enforcement Guide

11.
The Authority's policy in relation to its enforcement powers is set out in EG,
certain provisions of which are summarised below.

12.
EG 8.1.1 reflects the provisions of section 55J of the Act that the Authority may
use its own-initiative power to cancel a firm’s Part 4A permission where the firm
is failing or is likely to fail to satisfy the Threshold Conditions (EG 8.1.1(1)); or
where it is desirable to exercise the power in order to advance one or more of the
Authority’s operational objectives (EG 8.1.1(3)).

13.
EG 8.5.1(1) states that the Authority will consider cancelling a firm’s Part 4A
permission using its own-initiative power contained in section 55J of the Act in
circumstances where the Authority has very serious concerns about the firm.