FINAL NOTICE

ACTION

1. By an application dated 2 February 2021 (“the Application”), D T Cars &

Commercials Ltd (“D T Cars” or “the Applicant”) applied under section 55A of the
Act for Part 4A permission to carry on the regulated activities of:

a.
Agreeing to carry on a regulated activity;

b.
Credit Broking - Limited to secondary broking;

c.
Debt Adjusting – Limited to relevant credit activities; and

d.
Debt-counselling - Limited to relevant credit activities.

2. The Application is incomplete.

3. For the reasons listed below, the Authority has refused the Application.

SUMMARY OF REASONS

4. D T Cars has failed to respond to requests for the provision of information,

considered by the Authority, to be necessary to allow the Application to be
determined. The last request included a statement to the effect that D T Cars
must contact the Authority within 10 business days, or the Authority would issue
D T Cars with a Warning Notice. No response was received.

5. By its Warning Notice dated 20 January 2022 the Authority gave notice that it

proposed to refuse the application and that D T Cars was entitled to make
representations to the Authority about that proposed action. No representations
were received.


6. As no representations were received by the Authority from D T Cars within the

time allowed by the Warning Notice, the default procedures in paragraph 2.3.2 of
the Authority’s Decision Procedure and Penalties Manual applied, permitting the
Authority to treat the matters referred to in its Warning Notice as undisputed and,
accordingly, to give a Decision Notice.


7. By its Decision Notice dated 3 March 2022 the Authority gave D T Cars notice that

it had decided to take the action described above.


8. D T Cars had 28 days from the date the Decision Notice was given to refer the

matter to the Upper Tribunal. No referral was made to the Upper Tribunal within
this period of time or to date.


9. Under section 390 (1) of the Act, the Authority having decided to refuse the

Application and there having been no reference of that decision to the Tribunal,
must give D T Cars Final Notice of its refusal.


10. The Authority decided to refuse the Application and to give this Final Notice as D

T Cars has failed to provide the information required by the Authority, and in
absence of the information sought, the Authority cannot ensure that D T Cars
satisfies, and will continue to satisfy, the threshold conditions.

11. Authorised firms (and those seeking authorisation) are expected to engage with

the Authority in an open and cooperative way. The failure to provide the
requested information raises concerns that D T Cars would fail to do so if the
Application were to be granted.

12. The failure to provide the information raises concerns as to whether D T Cars:

a. can be effectively supervised by the Authority as required by threshold

condition 2C;

b. has appropriate human resources, given D T Car’s failure to provide the

Authority with the requested information as required by threshold
condition 2D; and

c. will conduct its business with integrity and in compliance with proper

standards as required by threshold condition 2E.

DEFINITIONS

13. The definitions below are used in this Final Notice.

“the Act” means the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000;

“the Application” means the application referred to in paragraph 1 above.

“the Authority” means the body corporate previously known as the Financial
Services Authority and renamed on 1 April 2013 as the Financial Conduct
Authority;

“the Decision Notice” means the Decision Notice dated [xx Month Year] given to
the applicant by the Authority;

“SMF” means the Senior Management Function;

“SUP” means the Supervision section of the Authority’s handbook;

“SYSC” means the Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and Controls
section of the Authority’s handbook;

“the Warning Notice” means the Warning Notice dated [xx Month Year] given to
the applicant by the Authority; and

“the Tribunal” means the Upper Tribunal (Tax & Chancery Chamber).

FACTS AND MATTERS

14. The Application was received by the Authority on 2 February 2021.

15. Further information was requested from D T Cars under section 55U(5) of the Act.

16. The Authority requested further information in support of the Application.

a. Further information was requested from the SMF 29 applicant on 4

November 2021. The Applicant was given until 10 November 2021 to
provide this information.

b. On 17 November 2021, the Authority contacted the Applicant to request

the outstanding information, providing the Applicant with a deadline of 23
November 2021 to respond.

c. Further contact was made with the Applicant on 24 November 2021, by the

Authority, to make another request for the outstanding information.

d. The Authority was asked by the Applicant to re-send its email of 4

November 2021. This was actioned by the Authority, with a deadline for
response of 29 November 2021. At this time, the Authority made a
statement to the effect that D T Cars must provide the outstanding
information by 29 November 2022, or the Authority would issue D T Cars
with a Warning Notice.

e. Further telephone calls were made by the Authority to the Applicant, on 2

December 2021 and 15 December 2021. Whilst the Authority successfully
made contact with the Applicant on 2 December 2021, reminding it of the
requirement to provide the outstanding information, attempts to make
further contact on 15 December 2021 were unsuccessful.

17. On 21 December 2021, the Authority sent a letter to D T Cars by way of email

and recorded delivery, noting the lack of a response to its requests for the
information and informing it that a failure to provide the information would result
in the Application being determined based upon the information received to date.

18. The Authority also informed D T Cars that this might result in the Authority

issuing D T Cars with a Warning Notice proposing to refuse the Application. D T
Cars failed to provide the outstanding information by the stated deadline of 10
January 2022.

19. On 20 January 2022, the Authority issued a Warning Notice to the Applicant,

proposing to refuse the application, and that D T Cars was entitled to make
representations to the Authority about that proposed action. The Authority
requested that any such representations were made to it by 17 February 2022.
No representations were received.

20. As no representations were received by the Authority from D T Cars within the

time allowed by the Warning Notice, the default procedures in paragraph 2.3.2 of
the Authority’s Decision Procedure and Penalties Manual applied, permitting the
Authority to treat the matters referred to in its Warning Notice as undisputed and,
accordingly, to give a Decision Notice.


21. D T Cars had 28 days from the date the Decision Notice was given to refer the

matter to the Upper Tribunal. No referral was made to the Upper Tribunal within
this period of time or to date.


22. Under section 390 (1) of the Act, the Authority having decided to refuse the

Application and there having been no reference of that decision to the Tribunal,
must give D T Cars Final Notice of its refusal.



IMPACT ON THRESHOLD CONDITIONS


23. D T Cars has failed to respond to four separate requests for the provision of

information considered by the Authority to be necessary to allow the Application
to be determined. The Warning Notice and Decision Notice sent to the Applicant
have not been responded to.

24. The Authority must therefore determine the Application based upon the

information received to date, in circumstances where its requests for information
have not been met. Having reviewed that information, the Authority cannot
ensure that D T Cars satisfies, and will continue to satisfy, the threshold
conditions.

25. Authorised firms (and those seeking authorisation) are expected to engage with

the Authority in an open and cooperative way. The failure to provide the

requested information raises concerns that D T Cars would fail to do so if the
Application were to be granted.

26. The failure to provide the information raises concerns as to whether D T Cars:

a. can be effectively supervised by the Authority as required by threshold

condition 2C;

b. has appropriate human resources, given D T Cars’ failure to provide the

Authority with the requested information as required by threshold
condition 2D; and

c. will conduct its business with integrity and in compliance with proper

standards as required by threshold condition 2E.

27. On the basis of the facts and matters described above, the Authority cannot

ensure that D T Cars will not satisfy, and continue to satisfy, the threshold
conditions in relation to all of the regulated activities for which D T Cars would
have permission if the application was granted, and accordingly has decided to
refuse the application.

IMPORTANT NOTICES

28. This Final Notice is given under section 390 of the Act.

PUBLICATION

29. Sections 391(4), 391(6) and 391(7) of the Act apply to the publication of

information about the matter to which this Notice relates. Under those provisions,
the Authority must publish such information about the matter to which this Notice
relates as the Authority considers appropriate. The information may be published
in such manner as the Authority considers appropriate. However, the Authority
may not publish information if such publication would, in the opinion of the
Authority, be unfair to you or prejudicial to the interests of consumers or
detrimental to the stability of the UK financial system.

30. The Authority intends to publish such information about the matter to which this

Final Notice relates as it considers appropriate

Authority contacts

31. For more information concerning this matter generally, contact Sarah Spivey,

Manager, Credit & Mortgage Intermediaries at the Authority (direct line: 020
7066 5949 / email: Sarah.Spivey3@fca.org.uk@fca.org.uk).

Sarah Spivey
Executive Decision Maker

ANNEX A – REGULATORY PROVISIONS RELEVANT TO THIS FINAL NOTICE

1. Section 55A(1) of the Act provides for an application for permission to carry on

one or more regulated activities to be made to the appropriate regulator. Section
55A(2) defines the “appropriate regulator” for different applications.

2. Section 55B(3) of the Act provides that, in giving or varying permission, imposing

or varying a requirement, or giving consent, under any provision of Part 4A of the
Act, each regulator must ensure that the person concerned will satisfy, and
continue to satisfy, in relation to all of the regulated activities for which the
person has or will have permission, the threshold conditions for which that
regulator is responsible.

3. The threshold conditions are set out in schedule 6 of the Act. In brief, the

threshold conditions relate to:

(1)
Threshold condition 2B: Location of offices

(2)
Threshold condition 2C: Effective supervision

(3)
Threshold condition 2D: Appropriate resources

(4)
Threshold condition 2E: Suitability

(5)
Threshold condition 2F: Business model

Relevant provisions of the Authority’s Handbook

4. In exercising its powers in relation to the granting of a Part 4A permission, the

Authority must have regard to guidance published in the Authority’s Handbook,
including
the
part
entitled
Threshold
Conditions
(“COND”).
The
main

considerations in relation to the action specified are set out below.

5. COND 1.3.2G(2) states that, in relation to threshold conditions 2D to 2F, the

Authority will consider whether a firm is ready, willing and organised to comply
on a continuing basis with the requirements and standards under the regulatory
system which will apply to the firm if it is granted Part 4A permission.

6. COND 1.3.3AG provides that, in determining the weight to be given to any

relevant matter, the Authority will consider its significance in relation to the
regulated activities for which the firm has, or will have, permission in the context
of its ability to supervise the firm adequately, having regard to the Authority’s
statutory objectives. In this context, a series of matters may be significant when
taken together, even though each of them in isolation might not give serious
cause for concern.

7. COND 1.3.3BG provides that, in determining whether the firm will satisfy, and

continue to satisfy, the Authority threshold conditions, the Authority will have
regard to all relevant matters, whether arising in the United Kingdom or
elsewhere.

Threshold Condition 2C: Effective Supervision

8. COND 2.3.3G states that, in assessing the threshold condition set out in

paragraph 2C of Schedule 6 to the Act, factors which the Authority will take into
consideration include, among other things, whether it is likely that the Authority
will receive adequate information from the firm to determine whether it is
complying with the requirements and standards under the regulatory system for
which the Authority is responsible and to identify and assess the impact on its
statutory objectives; this will include consideration of whether the firm is ready,
willing and organised to comply with Principle 11 (Relations with regulators) and
the rules in SUP on the provision of information to the Authority.

Threshold condition 2D: Appropriate Resources

9. COND 2.4.2G(2) states that the Authority will interpret the term 'appropriate' as

meaning sufficient in terms of quantity, quality and availability, and 'resources' as
including all financial resources (though only in the case of firms not carrying on,
or seeking to carry on, a PRA-regulated activity), non-financial resources and
means of managing its resources; for example, capital, provisions against
liabilities, holdings of or access to cash and other liquid assets, human resources
and effective means by which to manage risks.


10. COND 2.4.2G(2A) provides that, ‘non-financial resources’ of the firm include

human resources it has available.


11. COND 2.4.2G (3) states that high level systems and control requirements are in

SYSC. The Authority will consider whether the firm is ready, willing and organised
to comply with these and other applicable systems and controls requirements
when assessing if it has appropriate non-financial resources for the purpose of the
threshold conditions set out in threshold condition 2D.

Threshold condition 2E: Suitability

12. COND 2.5.2G(2) states that the Authority will also take into consideration

anything that could influence a firm's continuing ability to satisfy the threshold
conditions set out in paragraphs 2E and 3D of Schedule 6 to the Act. Examples
include the firm's position within a UK or international group, information
provided by overseas regulators about the firm, and the firm's plans to seek to
vary its Part 4A permission to carry on additional regulated activities once it has
been granted that permission.

13. COND 2.5.4G(2)(c)G states that examples of the kind of general considerations to

which the Authority may have regard when assessing whether a firm will satisfy,
and continue to satisfy, threshold condition 2E include, but are not limited to,
whether the firm can demonstrate that it conducts, or will conduct, its business
with integrity and in compliance with proper standards.

14. COND 2.5.6G provides that examples of the kind of particular considerations to

which the Authority may have regard when assessing whether a firm will satisfy,
and continue to satisfy, this threshold condition include, but are not limited to,
whether the firm has been open and co-operative in all its dealings with the
Authority and any other regulatory body (see Principle 11 (Relations with

regulators)) and is ready, willing and organised to comply with the requirements
and standards under the regulatory system (such as the detailed requirements of
SYSC and, in relation to a firm not carrying on, or seeking to carry on, a PRA-
regulated activity only, the Prudential Standards part of the Authority’s
Handbook)in addition to other legal, regulatory and professional obligations; the
relevant requirements and standards will depend on the circumstances of each
case, including the regulated activities which the firm has permission, or is
seeking permission, to carry on.